Skip to main content
Tallo logoTallo logo

Find Jobs

Find Jobs Near You – Available Work in Your Location

Skip to job details

Back to Results

Apply for this opportunity

To apply for this job, you'll continue to an external website or email application.

Meta

AI Policy Manager, Legislation

Review key factors to help you decide if the role fits your goals.
Pay Growth
?
out of 5
Not enough data
Not enough info to score pay or growth
Job Security
?
out of 5
Not enough data
Calculating job security score...
Total Score
100
out of 100
Average of individual scores

Were these scores useful?

Job Description

Meta is looking for a senior policy leader to own our legislative and regulatory strategy on AI models and frontier AI, joining our global AI Policy team. This role sits at the center of the fastest-moving policy debate in technology. Frontier model regulation is being written now, in Congress, in US state legislatures, in national parliaments, in Brussels, and in regulator consultations worldwide. The person in this role will shape both what those rules say and how Meta responds to them. You will set strategy, counsel product and research teams building frontier models on what compliance will require, and brief senior leadership and executives on the decisions that matter. The remit is genuinely global. You will operate with significant autonomy across a broad and ambiguous portfolio, and you will be a primary external face of the company on frontier AI with legislators, regulators, civil society, academics, and industry coalitions.
Qualifications:
10+ years of experience working on technology law or policy, in government, industry, private practice, civil society, or a combination Demonstrated expertise in AI policy, with substantive depth on frontier AI models, including their development, evaluation, deployment, and release, and on the regulatory debates surrounding them Technical fluency in how frontier models are built, evaluated, and deployed, sufficient to engage credibly with research and engineering teams and with technically sophisticated regulators Demonstrated leadership of legislative or regulatory advocacy strategies, from formation through to measurable outcomes, without day-to-day direction Experience analyzing and drafting legislation or regulation, including redlines and amendments Demonstrated experience briefing and advising senior leaders and executives, and making clear recommendations under uncertainty Demonstrated experience representing an organization externally with legislators, regulators, or coalitions Demonstrated skills and experience creating short- and long-form analyses, position papers, and talking points for both internal and external audiences Experience leading cross-functional work with legal, communications, and product or technical counterparts, including driving alignment across teams with competing priorities Experience prioritizing competing policy workstreams based on impact, deadlines, and stakeholder needs in fast-moving regulatory environments Experience creating scalable policy solutions and frameworks for policy teams to use based on knowledge of the AI policy environment JD degree 14+ years of experience working on technology law or policy Demonstrated ongoing AI skill development (e.g., prompt/context engineering, agent orchestration) and staying current with emerging AI technologies Experience adhering to and implementing responsible, ethical AI practices (e.g., risk assessment, bias mitigation, quality and accuracy reviews) Experience working across multiple regions of the world, particularly the US, EU, and UK Experience leading multi-stakeholder coalitions, trade association working groups, or standards processes Advanced degree in public policy, computer science, or a related technical field Demonstrated ability to integrate AI tools to optimize/redesign workflows and drive measurable impact (e.g., efficiency gains, quality improvements) Established relationships with legislators and their staff, regulators, or the AI policy research community Experience advising product, research, or engineering teams on translating regulatory requirements into product decisions, and vice versa