Skip to main content
Tallo logoTallo logo

Find Jobs

Find Jobs Near You – Available Work in Your Location

Skip to job details

Back to Results

Apply for this opportunity

To apply for this job, you'll continue to an external website or email application.

RW Flooring LLC

Flooring Sub-Contractor: Chicago IL

Job Description

We are seeking Flooring Sub-Contractors in the Chicago IL metro area. Contractors are responsible for performing all measures, and installations as well as maintains his/her schedule. RW Flooring is an installation provider for major retailers. We service most hard surface flooring types. This includes Vinyl plank, Hardwoods, Laminate, Engineered woods, and Tile. Installation methods include nail down, floating, glue down, and nail with glue assist. For Tile, showers, floors and backsplashes.
Requirements:
  • Pass background check
  • Have a minimum of 5 years' experience as Flooring Contractor
  • Provide current General Liability and Workers Comp Insurance.
  • Provide all tools.
  • Complete application and interview process.
  • Installer must be able to visit our retail partners periodically to build relationships with the team.
Ideal Contractor will be organized, professional and highly skilled in installation guidelines. Your communication ability is extremely important in working with a retail atmosphere. If interested, please apply and/or message us for more questions. 1-800-463-0989 for any additional information.
Job Type:
Contract Pay:
$1,700.00
  • $5,000.
00 per week Application Question(s): What is your best phone and email contact? Are you able to measure your projects assigned to you? How many people do you have on your team? Are you able to install all hard surface products including tile on floor, walls, and showers?
Work Location:
On the road
Review key factors to help you decide if the role fits your goals.
Pay Growth
?
out of 5
Not enough data
Not enough info to score pay or growth
Job Security
?
out of 5
Not enough data
Calculating job security score...
Total Score
56
out of 100
Average of individual scores

Were these scores useful?